Remember That You Are Your Goal
Individual Talk
From:The Book of Secrets
In stock
Osho,
Last night you said that a Krishna, a Christ, a Buddha, they are the climax of human possibility and growth, and then you said that Yogic and Tantric psychology put no ideal before man and that to have an ideal is a mistake according to Tantra. In this reference please explain what is the difference between an inspiration and an ideal. What is the significance of inspiration in a seeker's life? Please tell whether even being inspired by a great man is a mistake on the path of a meditator.
Last night you said that a Krishna, a Christ, a Buddha, they are the climax of human possibility and growth, and then you said that Yogic and Tantric psychology put no ideal before man and that to have an ideal is a mistake according to Tantra. In this reference please explain what is the difference between an inspiration and an ideal. What is the significance of inspiration in a seeker's life? Please tell whether even being inspired by a great man is a mistake on the path of a meditator.
Osho,
Last night you said that a Krishna, a Christ, a Buddha, they are the climax of human possibility and growth, and then you said that Yogic and Tantric psychology put no ideal before man and that to have an ideal is a mistake according to Tantra. In this reference please explain what is the difference between an inspiration and an ideal. What is the significance of inspiration in a seeker's life? Please tell whether even being inspired by a great man is a mistake on the path of a meditator.
Osho continues:
Last night you said that a Krishna, a Christ, a Buddha, they are the climax of human possibility and growth, and then you said that Yogic and Tantric psychology put no ideal before man and that to have an ideal is a mistake according to Tantra. In this reference please explain what is the difference between an inspiration and an ideal. What is the significance of inspiration in a seeker's life? Please tell whether even being inspired by a great man is a mistake on the path of a meditator.
"Christhood is the ideal, not Jesus. Buddhahood is different from Gautam Buddha; christhood is different from Jesus. Jesus is only one of the christs. You can become a christ, but you can never become a Jesus. You can become a buddha, but you can never become Gautam. Gautam became a buddha and you can become a buddha. Buddhahood is a quality, it is an experience! Of course, when Gautam became a buddha, Gautam had his own individuality. You have your own individuality. When you will become a buddha, these two buddhas will not be the same. The inner most experience will be the same, but the expression will be different – absolutely different. No comparison is possible. Only at the innermost core will you be the same.
"Why? Because at the innermost core there is no individuality. The individual is on the periphery. The deeper you move, the more the individual dissolves. At the innermost core you are as if no one. At the innermost core you are just a deep void, a nothingness – a shunya, a zero. And because of this nothingness there is no difference, because two nothings cannot be different. But two somethings are bound to be different. Two 'somethings' can never be the same and two 'nothings' can never be different. When one becomes just absolutely nothing, a zero point, that is similar in a Jesus, in a Krishna, in a Buddha. When you will reach to the ultimate, you will reach to this shunya – this nothingness.
"But your personality, your expression of that ecstasy, is bound to be different. A Meera will dance; a Buddha can never dance. It is impossible to conceive of Buddha dancing, it looks absurd. But Meera sitting under a bodhi tree like a Buddha also looks absurd. She will lose everything, she will not be a Meera at all; she will be imitation. The real Meera can only be conceived of as dancing in ecstasy in her own love madness. That is her expression. The innermost core is the same. With Buddha sitting under the bodhi tree and Meera dancing in mad ecstasy, the innermost core is the same. In the dancing Meera and in the silently sitting Buddha who is just like a statue, the innermost core is the same but the periphery is different."
"Why? Because at the innermost core there is no individuality. The individual is on the periphery. The deeper you move, the more the individual dissolves. At the innermost core you are as if no one. At the innermost core you are just a deep void, a nothingness – a shunya, a zero. And because of this nothingness there is no difference, because two nothings cannot be different. But two somethings are bound to be different. Two 'somethings' can never be the same and two 'nothings' can never be different. When one becomes just absolutely nothing, a zero point, that is similar in a Jesus, in a Krishna, in a Buddha. When you will reach to the ultimate, you will reach to this shunya – this nothingness.
"But your personality, your expression of that ecstasy, is bound to be different. A Meera will dance; a Buddha can never dance. It is impossible to conceive of Buddha dancing, it looks absurd. But Meera sitting under a bodhi tree like a Buddha also looks absurd. She will lose everything, she will not be a Meera at all; she will be imitation. The real Meera can only be conceived of as dancing in ecstasy in her own love madness. That is her expression. The innermost core is the same. With Buddha sitting under the bodhi tree and Meera dancing in mad ecstasy, the innermost core is the same. In the dancing Meera and in the silently sitting Buddha who is just like a statue, the innermost core is the same but the periphery is different."
Publisher | Osho International |
---|---|
Duration of Talk | 80 mins |
File Size | 15.93 MB |
Type | Individual Talks |
Edition/ Version | 2 |
The information below is required for social login
Sign In or Create Account
Create New Account